Given how far this actress
has come in such a relatively short time, nothing but congratulations are due
all around — both to her and the Hollywood studio that has boosted her into
that rarefied celebrity status of movie star marqueed only by surname. Where there was once Garbo, Crawford,
Schwarzenegger, and Stallone, now comes (no first names, please) McCarthy.
No, not the 1950s senator from Wisconsin. That last name
belongs to Melissa McCarthy.
Although fans of that consummately scripted TV series Gilmore Girls (2000-07) have long admired McCarthy’s bubbly
presence on that show as Sookie St. James (as, I suspect, do followers of her
current sitcom, Mike and Molly,
which I have not seen), the actress truly grabbed the movie-going public’s
attention in the role of the single-minded Megan in the unexpected hit Bridesmaids (2011).
From there, more quickly than you would expect from an actress busy with
a sitcom, she landed the co-starring role of the title character in Identity Thief (2013). Now appears her single-name,
above-the-title co-starring credit in the upcoming Twentieth Century Fox
release The Heat (2013). For any thespian, this would be a
meteoric ascent.
But it seems especially true
for a plus-size actress.
I’m sure I don’t need to tell
anyone that Hollywood is notorious for turning its cameras on leading ladies
whose body-fat ratio is well below average. The last time that Hollywood had a major female star who was
something other than svelte was in 1930, when the matronly Marie Dressler rose
all the way to the top of the box office.
But this was back in those years when movie-going was seen as a family
affair where the mothers chose which titles to attend, mothers who apparently
identified with Dressler’s world-weary matriarchs. (While venerated headliner Meryl Streep’s figure
wouldn’t exactly be described as willowy these days, the adjective applied back
when she first broke into Hollywood.)
Yes, as an overweight female film
star, Melissa McCarthy’s career so far seems to have some predictable
perimeters: she has only been featured in comic roles; she hasn’t broken above
second billing. But this early in
her big-screen career, I’m willing to trust the cinematic fates to exceed those
usual boundaries.
And yet, something bothers me
a bit when I see Fox’s movie posters for The Heat. Why is
top-billed (and trim) actress Sandra Bullock standing in front of McCarthy in
the way that she is? I’m not
annoyed by the idea that a well-established box-office luminary might take some
precedence ahead of a second-billed player fresh to Hollywood’s star-making
machinery. No, I’m bothered by the
idea that Fox is using Bullock’s image to obscure McCarthy’s ample dimensions.
Shades of racism? Movie posters for ‘The Replacement Killers’ and ‘Romeo Must Die’ |
This reminds me of those two
times when two stars of the Hong Kong film industry, Chow Yun-Fat and Jet Li,
broke into Hollywood with their first starring vehicles. Chow’s movie was The Replacement
Killers (1998) and Li’s was Romeo
Must Die (2000). In the posters for these two action
films starring male leads from East Asia, both were wearing sunglasses. Perhaps the Foster-Grants were primarily there to instill an
aura of coolness. But the
sunglasses did something else: conceal the eyes of two new male stars from Asia whose eyelids are shaped differently than those of the male
stars in Hollywood.
‘The Heat’: Which is Melissa McCarthy and which is Sandra Bullock? |
In the poster for The Heat, Bullock’s body seems to be doing to tyro movie-star
McCarthy’s corpulent physique what the sunglasses did to tyro movie-stars
Chow’s and Li’s eyes: not scare away filmgoers resistant to the idea of leading
men and women who look different than the others. With The Heat,
Hollywood once again seems to be hedging its bets on whether cinema audiences
are ready for a different kind of movie star.
Granted, this early in the
game — several weeks before The Heat’s release — is too soon to be nitpicking at the
picture’s politics. And I wish the
movie and its stars well. But this
tendency for Hollywood to downplay a newfangled star’s variance from the
Tinseltown norm is worth mulling over for a minute.
No comments:
Post a Comment